SOS And Bertolli Strike A Deal
The big news of recent days is the confirmation that Unilever will be selling its edible oils and vinegar businesses to the Spanish company SOS-Cuétara. The deal, reported by all news services to be worth 630 million euros, is actually a perpetual right to use the brand name 'Bertolli', along with various other labels owned by the Dutch company, solely in the sales of the above products. Unilever will continue to market various prepared foods in that name. In this regard, it is an odd arrangement, seeing as two independently run companies will be defending the integrity of one well-known brand. One can imagine a situation arising in which, for example, tomato sauce sold by Unilever as Bertolli were to encounter some sort of public health problem. How would olive oil from SOS escape implication in the eyes of the consumer?
Details as to how SOS is to fund the purchase are, so far, scant. Mentioned in a number of places have been the possibility of bridge financing. For the uninitiated, this is a loan that banks give you when you have expenses to pay now but will not be receiving income until some pointing the future. The loan provides a 'bridge' between the two dates and is typically - without even taking into account the currently problematic credit markets - fairly expensive, reflecting the risk that the future might not materialize as foreseen. The situation likely reflects a certain difficulty in locating willing lenders through normal channels. The proposed source of the funds to repay the bridge loan included the stock market (less than wholly appealing in the current environment) and the sale of assets. As an aside (and without declaring or implying that it is or might ever have been the case), were interested parties ever to consider entering into stock market transactions to defend the company's valuation, the sudden inclusion of Bertolli, conceivably with Caparelli included, would immediately make desired results much more expensive to attain.
As to the impact the completion of this deal might have on the market, one can only think that having one company controlling the bottling and marketing of 25 or 30 percent of worldwide olive oil sales will be less than happy news for producers, although it is possible that consumers may derive some benefit. Growers and co-ops should prepare to deal with an even more recalcitrant bid in the future. One can also imagine certain groups preparing presentations for competition tribunals at both national and the EU level.
Interesting (or perhaps, revealing) the Madrid stock exchange reaction to the news. The revelation on Monday produced a very muted reaction 0.1% gain. Although SOS' stock is since up 5% (as of the time of this post) the accompanying volume of sales has not been, by any measure, outstanding. One would have thought that SOS' commitment to spend around 35 or 40 percent of its current average annual gross revenues of the last few years (according to Reuters) on a single aquisition would have produced more excitement - were it to be positive or negative.
